DeFi Interest Rate Models Explained: How Algorithms Control Lending and Borrowing Rates
5 February 2026

Ever wonder how DeFi lending platforms set interest rates without banks? Unlike traditional finance where central banks control rates, DeFi uses smart contracts to automatically adjust borrowing and lending costs based on real-time supply and demand. This article breaks down how these models work, why they matter, and what you need to know as a user.

What are DeFi interest rate models?

DeFi interest rate models are algorithmic frameworks that calculate interest rates for digital assets without human intervention. These models emerged in 2017 with ETHLend (now Aave) and Compound in 2018. They replaced traditional banking intermediaries with transparent, on-chain code that adjusts rates based on how much of each asset is borrowed versus available. The result? Rates that respond instantly to market conditions.

How utilization rate drives rates

Utilization rate is the key variable in every DeFi interest rate model. It's calculated as the percentage of supplied assets currently being borrowed. For example, if a pool has $10 million available and $8 million borrowed, the utilization rate is 80%. When utilization is low, rates stay low to attract more borrowers. As utilization climbs, rates rise to incentivize lenders to supply more funds. If utilization hits 100%, lenders can't withdraw their money-so protocols avoid this by design.

The kinked model explained

Aave uses a kinked interest rate model-the most common approach today. This model has two slopes: a gentle slope up to 80-95% utilization, then a sharp spike beyond that point. For instance, Aave's USDC supply rate increases slowly from 1% to 4% as utilization rises to 80%, then jumps to 15%+ beyond 95%. This encourages users to deposit more when rates get too high, preventing liquidity crunches. Compound uses a similar but less aggressive kink, while MakerDAO's model is more linear.

Fish tank with water level and graph illustrating utilization rate.

Comparison of major protocols

Comparison of Major DeFi Lending Protocols
Protocol Supply APY (USDC) Borrow APR (USDC) Max LTV
Aave 7.47% 8.94% 80%
Compound 8.30% 4.10% 75%
MakerDAO 11.50% 12.50% 66-75%

User experiences and challenges

DeFi users appreciate the transparency of algorithmic rates. On Reddit's r/DeFi community, many praise how they can predict rate changes using utilization metrics. However, volatility remains a pain point. During the March 2020 market crash, Aave's borrowing rates spiked over 50% APY, triggering unexpected liquidations for some users. Aave's user rating is 4.2/5 for predictability, while Compound scores 3.8/5 for stability. For experienced users, these fluctuations create arbitrage opportunities-like borrowing from a low-rate protocol and lending to a higher one.

Three houses with unique roof shapes illustrating interest rate models.

Current trends and future developments

DeFi lending has grown to $50 billion in total value locked as of October 2025. Aave leads with 35% market share, followed by Compound at 20%. New protocols are refining rate models further. Aave's upcoming V4 release (Q2 2025) will smooth rate volatility around the kink point. Compound's V3 update uses historical data to adjust kinks dynamically. Some projects are even testing AI-driven rate adjustments. Meanwhile, traditional finance is taking notice-JP Morgan's JPM Coin now uses similar utilization-based pricing. Experts agree these models will keep evolving toward more stability while keeping their core transparency advantage over traditional banking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is utilization rate in DeFi lending?

Utilization rate measures how much of a loan pool's assets are currently borrowed. It's calculated as (total borrowed / total supplied) × 100%. For example, if $8 million is borrowed from a $10 million pool, utilization is 80%. Protocols use this number to adjust interest rates in real-time-higher utilization means higher borrowing rates to incentivize more lending.

Why do interest rates spike during market crashes?

During sharp price drops (like March 2020), borrowers rush to repay loans to avoid liquidation. This causes utilization rates to spike as assets get repaid faster than new loans. High utilization triggers steep rate increases in kinked models. For example, Aave's rates jumped to 50%+ APY when utilization exceeded 95%. These spikes encourage lenders to supply more funds, but can also cause liquidation cascades for borrowers with high leverage.

What's the difference between stable and variable rates in DeFi?

Stable rates lock in a fixed interest for the duration of the loan, while variable rates adjust automatically based on utilization. Aave offers both options: stable rates for predictable borrowing costs, variable rates for potentially lower costs during low utilization. Most users prefer variable rates since they're cheaper when demand is low, but stable rates protect against sudden spikes. MakerDAO only offers variable rates for borrowing.

How do loan-to-value (LTV) ratios affect DeFi lending?

LTV determines how much you can borrow against your collateral. For example, an 80% LTV means you can borrow up to 80% of your collateral's value. Higher LTV ratios (like Aave's 80%) let you borrow more but increase liquidation risk. Lower LTVs (MakerDAO's 66%) are safer but require more collateral. If the asset's price drops enough to push your loan above the LTV threshold, your collateral gets liquidated to cover the debt.

Can DeFi interest rate models replace traditional banking?

Not yet, but they're getting closer. DeFi models offer faster, more transparent rates without intermediaries. However, they still face challenges like regulatory uncertainty, scalability issues, and volatility risks. Traditional banks have stability and insurance, while DeFi excels in accessibility and innovation. Experts predict hybrid models will emerge-where traditional institutions adopt DeFi's algorithmic approaches for specific services, like JP Morgan's JPM Coin. Full replacement is unlikely, but DeFi will continue reshaping parts of finance.