WSPP Airdrop Calculator
Calculate how much WSPP you would have received if you had participated in the WSPP airdrop on MEXC. The 2021 airdrop distributed 215 million WSPP tokens to users who staked MX tokens to vote for WSPP listing.
How the Airdrop Worked
The WSPP airdrop required users to stake MX tokens to vote for listing on MEXC. When the voting goal of 18,956,491.25 MX tokens was reached on December 13, 2021, 215 million WSPP tokens were distributed to participants.
Your reward was calculated based on your proportional contribution to the total MX tokens staked.
Back in December 2021, a small crypto project called Wolf Safe Poor People (WSPP) pulled off one of the more unusual airdrops in blockchain history. It wasn’t about getting rich quick. It wasn’t even about hype. It was about using cryptocurrency to fight poverty - and it worked, at least for a moment.
The project launched on Binance Smart Chain, then expanded to Polygon. Why Polygon? Because gas fees were cheaper, transactions were faster, and it made sense for a project trying to reach people who couldn’t afford to pay $5 just to send a token. The total supply? 3.2 billion WSPP tokens. The goal? To become the first currency designed to reduce global poverty through decentralized tech.
The airdrop didn’t come from a team wallet. It came from the community.
How the WSPP Airdrop Actually Worked
The WSPP airdrop wasn’t handed out randomly. You didn’t just sign up and get free tokens. You had to earn it.
MEXC Exchange ran a program called Kickstarter - not the kind where you back a product, but one where you vote with your crypto. Users staked MX tokens (MEXC’s native token) to vote for new projects to list on the exchange. If a project hit its voting goal, it got listed - and everyone who voted got a free airdrop of the new token.
For WSPP, the goal was 18,956,491.25 MX tokens. The community hit it. On December 13, 2021, the voting closed. The result? 215 million WSPP tokens were distributed to 1,874 participants. Each person got a share based on how much MX they staked. No KYC. No fees. Just a direct reward for helping a project get listed.
That’s rare. Most airdrops today are just marketing fluff - tokens dumped on wallets to create fake engagement. WSPP’s airdrop was a real vote. People risked their own MX tokens to support a cause. And they got paid for it.
What Happened After the Airdrop?
After the airdrop, WSPP was officially listed on MEXC. You could trade WSPP/USDT. Deposits and withdrawals worked. The project had momentum.
But here’s the catch: no one else followed.
Binance? Never listed it. Coinbase? No. Kraken? Not even close. The only place you could trade it was MEXC - and even there, volume dropped fast. Today, the Polygon version of WSPP trades at $0.0000000194. That’s less than a billionth of a dollar. The market cap? Around $54. The 24-hour trading volume? About $104. For comparison, a single Bitcoin transaction costs more than the entire market value of WSPP.
The original Binance Smart Chain version is even worse - trading at $0.0000000000624. The 24-hour volume is $1,372, but that’s still tiny for a project that once had a 215 million token airdrop.
Why? Because the real challenge wasn’t getting tokens out - it was proving the mission worked.
The Promise: Crypto to Fight Poverty
Wolf Safe Poor People claimed to be the first cryptocurrency with a built-in poverty reduction program. The idea was simple: every time someone held or traded WSPP, a portion of the transaction would go toward funding real-world aid. No middlemen. No charities taking 30% in fees. Just smart contracts sending value directly to people in need.
They even built a platform called Wolfible - meant to be a decentralized marketplace for NFTs and fundraising tools to support poverty programs. The vision? Use blockchain to connect donors with recipients without banks, governments, or NGOs in between.
But here’s the problem: no one ever saw the money move.
No public ledger showed donations going to food, clean water, or medical aid. No partner organizations were named. No photos, no receipts, no reports. Just promises.
People believed in the idea. But belief doesn’t pay for a child’s meal. Action does.
Security and Tech - Solid, But Not Enough
The project wasn’t a scam. The code was audited by Solidity Finance. The contract address on Polygon - 0x46d502fac9aea7c5bc7b13c8ec9d02378c33d36f - is public and verifiable. The smart contract works as intended. The decentralization model is sound. The team even hosted the frontend on Swarm, a peer-to-peer storage system, so no central server could be shut down.
But good tech doesn’t fix a broken mission.
Most crypto projects fail because they’re built on hype. WSPP failed because it was built on hope - without proof.
Why WSPP Didn’t Survive
Three reasons.
- No measurable impact. You can’t claim to fight poverty if no one can see the results. People don’t trust words. They trust data.
- No real partnerships. No NGOs, no UN agencies, no local charities. Just a Telegram group with 2,000 members.
- No liquidity. If you can’t buy or sell a token easily, it’s not money - it’s a digital post-it note.
The airdrop was brilliant. The execution? Barely there.
What You Can Learn From WSPP
Even if WSPP faded, it left behind a lesson that matters more than any token price.
Blockchain can be used for good. But only if the good is real.
If you’re building a crypto project with a social mission - whether it’s poverty, education, or clean energy - you need three things:
- Proof. Show the money. Show the impact. Show who got helped.
- Partners. Work with organizations that already do the work. Don’t try to replace them - amplify them.
- Transparency. Open the books. Publish reports. Let people see every dollar move.
WSPP had the tech. It had the airdrop. It had the vision. But it didn’t have the proof.
And in crypto, proof is everything.
Is WSPP Still Active?
Technically, yes. The contract still exists. The Telegram group (@robowolfproject) still posts updates - mostly about future plans for Wolfible and NFT fundraising. But there’s no trading activity. No new listings. No partnerships announced.
The last major update was in early 2022. Since then? Silence.
Most of the original airdrop recipients sold their tokens within weeks. A few held on, hoping for a comeback. None came.
Final Thoughts
The WSPP airdrop was a moment - not a movement.
It showed that crypto communities can rally behind a cause. It showed that airdrops can be meaningful, not just promotional. But it also showed how easy it is to lose momentum when the mission isn’t backed by action.
If you’re thinking of joining a similar project today - don’t look at the token price. Look at the impact.
Ask: Who is this helping? How do we know? Where’s the proof?
Because in the end, crypto won’t save the poor. People will. And if you’re using blockchain to help them - make sure they can see it.
Was the WSPP airdrop real?
Yes, the WSPP airdrop was real. It happened on December 13, 2021, through MEXC’s Kickstarter program. Users staked MX tokens to vote for WSPP to be listed on the exchange. Once the voting goal of nearly 19 million MX tokens was reached, 215 million WSPP tokens were distributed to participants. The transaction records are public on the Polygon blockchain.
Can I still claim WSPP tokens from the airdrop?
No. The airdrop was a one-time event tied to the MEXC Kickstarter campaign in December 2021. The distribution window closed after the voting goal was met. There are no ongoing airdrops, and no official way to claim more tokens now.
Is WSPP still trading anywhere?
WSPP is still listed on MEXC as a WSPP/USDT trading pair, but trading volume is extremely low - under $100 per day. It is not listed on Binance, Coinbase, or any major exchange. The token’s price is near zero, and liquidity is minimal, making it nearly impossible to buy or sell without significant slippage.
Did WSPP actually help reduce poverty?
There is no public evidence that WSPP ever transferred funds to poverty relief programs. While the project claimed to use token transactions to fund aid, no receipts, partner organizations, donation logs, or impact reports were ever published. Without transparency, the poverty reduction claim remains unverified.
Is the WSPP smart contract safe?
Yes. The WSPP contract on Polygon (0x46d502fac9aea7c5bc7b13c8ec9d02378c33d36f) was audited by Solidity Finance, a reputable blockchain security firm. The audit report is publicly available and shows no critical vulnerabilities. However, a secure contract doesn’t mean the project is viable - it only means the code works as written.
What happened to the Wolfible platform?
The Wolfible platform, meant to be a decentralized NFT and fundraising hub for poverty relief, was announced as part of WSPP’s roadmap but was never launched. No website, demo, or public testnet was ever released. The project’s website (wolfsafepoorpeople.com) still exists but hasn’t been updated since 2022.
Should I invest in WSPP now?
No. WSPP has negligible trading volume, no exchange support beyond MEXC, and no active development. The token’s value is nearly zero, and there’s no reason to believe it will recover. Investing now would be speculative at best and a total loss at worst. The project’s mission may be noble, but its execution has failed.
Are there any similar projects today that actually help the poor?
Yes. Projects like GiveCrypto and BitGive have successfully distributed cryptocurrency directly to people in need, with public donation records and partnerships with NGOs. Unlike WSPP, they publish real-time data showing who received funds, how much, and for what purpose. Their success comes from transparency - not just good intentions.
17 Comments
Devon Bishop
November 20, 2025 AT 06:40 AMman i still remember when wspp dropped. i staked like 500 mx and got maybe 80k tokens. thought i was gonna retire. now my wallet’s worth less than a cup of coffee. crypto’s full of dreams and zero accountability.
sammy su
November 20, 2025 AT 09:19 AMthe real win here wasn’t the tokens-it was proving that a community can rally behind something bigger than profit. even if it crashed, it showed us what crypto *could* be. shame no one followed up.
Abhishek Anand
November 20, 2025 AT 21:36 PMthe tragedy of wspp is not its collapse-it is the epistemological vacuum at its core. a blockchain without phenomenological proof of impact is merely a syntactic illusion. the smart contract may be audited, but the moral contract? utterly unverifiable. we mistake decentralization for righteousness. we confuse transparency with performance. and in doing so, we reduce humanitarianism to a liquidity pool.
the project didn’t fail because of poor execution-it failed because it never transcended the ontological limits of crypto culture. it was a meme dressed as a movement. and memes, no matter how noble, evaporate when the sun rises.
givecrypto, by contrast, operates within the epistemic framework of measurable charity. it does not dream-it documents. it does not promise-it receipts. this is the difference between philosophy and praxis.
vinay kumar
November 21, 2025 AT 05:51 AMall these people talking about proof like its some holy grail. you think charities actually show you where every dollar goes? no they dont. they lie and take 30% and you still cheer for them. wspp was better than 99% of nonprofits. at least the code worked.
Lara Ross
November 23, 2025 AT 05:43 AMTHIS IS EXACTLY WHY WE NEED STRUCTURE IN DEFI. NO MORE VAGUE PROMISES. NO MORE ‘WE’LL DO IT LATER.’ TRANSPARENCY IS NON-NEGOTIABLE. IF YOU CLAIM TO HELP THE POOR, YOU MUST PUBLISH DAILY DONATION LOGS, PARTNER WITH VERIFIED NGOs, AND ALLOW REAL-TIME TRACKING. THIS ISN’T OPTIONAL. THIS IS ETHICS. WSPP HAD THE TECHNOLOGY-IT LACKED THE COURAGE TO BE ACCOUNTABLE.
Leisa Mason
November 24, 2025 AT 16:22 PMhow is this even a topic? the token is worth 0.0000000194. the team vanished. the website is a ghost town. the only thing still alive is the delusion of people who still think this was ‘meaningful.’ it was a poorly executed PR stunt wrapped in socialist fantasy. stop romanticizing failure.
Rob Sutherland
November 25, 2025 AT 22:40 PMwe all want to believe tech can fix human problems. but tech doesn’t care. it just does what it’s told. wspp’s code was clean. its heart? maybe. but without someone there to turn code into care, it’s just noise. the real question isn’t why it failed-it’s why we keep expecting blockchain to be our savior.
Tim Lynch
November 26, 2025 AT 19:03 PMremember when we thought crypto could be the great equalizer? when we believed that a decentralized token could feed a child in Nairobi or pay for a sick woman’s medicine in rural India? wspp was that dream, raw and unfiltered. and it died not because it was greedy-but because the world didn’t want to see the truth. we don’t want proof. we want poetry. and poetry doesn’t pay bills.
the audited contract? beautiful. the silent Telegram group? heartbreaking. the 215 million tokens distributed? a miracle. the zero impact? a tragedy. we built a cathedral and forgot to light the candles.
Melina Lane
November 27, 2025 AT 23:20 PMi held wspp for a year hoping it’d come back. it didn’t. but i’m not mad. i helped fund something that *tried*. that’s more than most projects do. if you’re building something for the poor-don’t wait for perfection. just start. show up. be messy. be real. the world needs more wspps, not more billionaires.
andrew casey
November 28, 2025 AT 22:25 PMOne must consider the structural implications of decentralized philanthropy in a capitalist ecosystem. The very premise of WSPP-that a token could circumvent institutional hierarchies and deliver direct aid-was an admirable, albeit naive, attempt to disrupt the charity-industrial complex. However, the absence of institutional validation, regulatory compliance, and fiduciary oversight rendered its operational model fundamentally unsustainable. One cannot substitute transparency with idealism, no matter how noble the intention.
Lani Manalansan
November 30, 2025 AT 14:45 PMin india we have a saying: ‘jaha darr, waha bhagwan’-where there’s fear, there’s god. wspp scared the crypto elite because it was real. no pump, no dump, no influencers. just people voting with their money to help strangers. that’s why it died. the system doesn’t reward truth. it rewards noise.
i’m not surprised no big exchange listed it. they’d rather sell you a useless NFT of a monkey than fund a child’s school lunch.
Frank Verhelst
December 1, 2025 AT 22:32 PMstill have my wspp tokens. 34 million of em. worth like 7 cents. but i keep them as a reminder. not to invest. to remember. we can do better. we just gotta stop pretending that ‘maybe someday’ is a plan.
❤️
Roshan Varghese
December 3, 2025 AT 06:12 AMwspp was a government psyop to track poor people’s wallets. they gave out tokens so the feds could see who was getting crypto and then cut their food stamps. the ‘audit’? fake. the ‘polygon’ chain? monitored by the cia. they wanted to see who was actually poor. now they know. you think this is a coincidence? wake up.
Dexter Guarujá
December 4, 2025 AT 11:52 AMusa doesn’t need some foreign crypto project to tell us how to help the poor. we have our own charities. our own systems. this wspp nonsense is just another woke crypto scam trying to steal american values. if you want to help poor people, donate to your local food bank-not some anonymous smart contract on polygon.
Jennifer Corley
December 5, 2025 AT 18:01 PMthe fact that people still defend this is proof that crypto culture has no moral compass. you don’t get to call yourself ‘poverty fighters’ when you can’t even name a single recipient. you didn’t help anyone. you just made a token and called it activism. that’s not noble. it’s narcissism with a blockchain.
Natalie Reichstein
December 6, 2025 AT 17:00 PMif you held wspp and didn’t sell it immediately you’re either a fool or a true believer. and neither is a good position to be in. this wasn’t a project. it was a trap wrapped in virtue signaling. the only thing that got ‘helped’ was the team’s ego.
Kaitlyn Boone
December 8, 2025 AT 07:44 AMthe only thing more sad than wspp’s failure is how many people still talk about it like it meant something. it was a poorly coded toy with a cute name. the auditors didn’t check the mission. they checked the code. big difference. and the mission? dead on arrival.